Loading benchmark data…
EyesInAI·Loading live benchmark data
The internet rewards a big GitHub star count, but stars measure hype, not fit. The question that actually matters for a team is narrower: would this survive contact with my stack, my hardware, my data rules, and the tools I already run? Most of the time — honestly — the answer is no. This is the ledger of tools we evaluated properly and chose notto ship, with the concrete reason on each. It's the same measured posture as the rest of the site: we show the receipts, including the ones that end in “we passed.”
A fairness rule we hold to: every entry is framed as “didn't fit us,”never “this is a bad project.” Most of these are genuinely good tools — the mismatch is with our constraints, not their quality. Some we deferred rather than rejected; some we kept as a reference architecture without installing. The counterpart to this page is Automation & Agents — the harness tools we did keep.
We evaluated it fairly, then realized we already have a path that does this — often with stronger guardrails.
Genuine merit. Blocked on hardware, timing, or a dependency rather than quality — teed up for when the blocker clears.
Worth studying for its architecture or packaging, but there was nothing here to actually deploy for us.
Overlaps — and would conflict — with a capability already in our stack. Adding it would be sprawl, not value.
Could not be adopted the way it was pitched: unavailable on our routes, or barred by our data-sovereignty rules.